Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems v. Nebraska Dept of Banking

Mortgage loan clearinghouse company that held titles as nominee was not a "morgage banker" subject to Nebraska mortgage banker licensing and regulation.

 

Mortgage Elec. Reg. Sys. v. Nebraska Dept. of Banking, 270 Neb. 529 October 21, 2005. No. S-04-786.

 

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), appealed an order of the Department of Banking and Finance (the Department), declaring that MERS is a "mortgage banker" under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-702 (Reissue 2004) and therefore subject to the license and registration requirements of the Mortgage Bankers Registration and Licensing Act (the Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-701 et seq. (Reissue 2004). The district court affirmed the order, and MERS appealed. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that MERS is not a mortgage banker as defined by the Act and, therefore, reverse the judgment of the district court. The MERS system was created to facilitate the transfer of ownership interests and servicing rights in mortgage loans. Under the System, MERS serves as mortgagee of record for participating members through assignment of the members' interests to MERS. Mortgage lenders participate in the MERS System as members upon completion of a membership application.

 

 ...we conclude that such services are not equivalent to acquiring mortgage loans, as defined by the Act. In other words, through its services to its members as characterized by the district court, MERS does not acquire "any loan or extension of credit secured by a lien on real property." MERS does not itself extend credit or acquire rights to receive payments on mortgage loans. Rather, the lenders retain the promissory notes and servicing rights to the mortgage, while MERS acquires legal title to the mortgage for recordation purposes. MERS serves as legal title holder in a nominee capacity, permitting lenders to sell their interests in the notes and servicing rights to investors without recording each transaction. But, simply stated, MERS has no independent right to collect on any debt because MERS itself has not extended credit, and none of the mortgage debtors owe MERS any money. Based on the foregoing, we conclude that MERS does not acquire mortgage loans, as defined in § 45-702(8), and therefore, MERS is not subject to the requirements of the Act

 

Also See: MERS Stubs Its Toe Trying to Foreclose.

 

This information is presented to you by the Bank Fraud Victim Center. Our mission is to educate homeowners about predatory lending practices, bank fraud and the legal options available to them. 

 

We believe that if you don't know your rights, you don’t know your options.

website: http://mortgage-home-loan-bank-fraud.com

 

Find out if you are a victim of predatory lending practices:

TO GET A  FREE  PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION CLICK HERE!

 

 

| http://mortgage-home-loan-bank-fraud.com | Articles | Foreclosure Help | Legal Disclaimer |

| Case Law | Legal Resources| Resources | Privacy Policy |

| Site Map | About Us | Contact Us |

 

Bank Fraud Victim Center

Copyright © All rights reserved.